Over the past
two days in my classroom we have been working on “change to more”/ “change to
less” problems and their appropriate number models. As anticipated, this was a mildly difficult
task for me to teach and for students to understand. We started with change to more and using the specific
language of “add 5” and “plus 5” to introduce the + and = symbol in creating
number models. We went through this
process step by step by having a start number, a change of “add X” and an end
number to create the number model. Students
used their number grids to start at a number, and manipulate the “hops” or added
amount to arrive at their ending number.
This was fairly easy for students to grasp because manipulating the number
grid and getting bigger is something they are very familiar with. However, once we moved to change to less,
students had difficulty hopping backwards specifically doing a backwards sweep.
The piece of student work I will
be looking at is an example of the difficulty encountered when doing change to
less problems and counting back on the number grid. This sheet was given during independent work
time and at first the student did every example as a change to more and added
on completely ignoring the “minus” clue and all the examples we had done in
guided practice together. Once I explained
again that minus means take away, and when we take away we move back on the number
grid the student started over. I sat
with him for the first problem which required him to start at 15, and “minus 4”. He accurately ended at 11 and wrote the appropriate
number model with a subtraction and equal sign, so I moved on to other students
with the intention to return in a moment.
When I came back I noticed something strange. He had some correct responses where he didn’t
have to complete a reverse sweep (ex: from 11 up a row to 10) and others were
about 10 off. I asked him to show me how
he completed these problems. One example
was start at 22 and “minus 6”. He began
correctly at 22 and his fingers followed this route, “22, 21, 30, 29, 28, 27,
26”. As I watched him do this I realized
that as he needed to make a sweep from 21 to 20 he instead swept to 30, a
bigger number. When I asked him if it
made sense to go from 21 to 30 he agreed it didn’t but wasn’t sure where he
should’ve gone instead. We went over the
process of counting back together until he showed me independently he
understood the concept. The mistake he
was making leads me to believe he simply had a misconception not about how to count back but which way to go about manipulating the number
grid.
Also try to think about other problems that might elicit this thinking. Specifically, I am thinking about how you might present certain problems in which it is more advantageous to count backwards and some where it is less advantageous. This will get the student to think about the utility of this procedure, rather than just trying to master it for the sake of mastering it.
ReplyDelete