My sample of student
work comes from a second grade female student named “Jane”. The second graders in my class are reviewing
(some learning for the first time) how to tell time on an analog clock. The artifact I’ll reference is a homework
sheet that asked students to draw the hour and minute hand on six clocks with a
given time, and tell what time it is from three clocks that are filled
out. The first clock on the page asks
for the hands to be drawn to show 9:00.
This clock, as an example/reference, also has the minutes labeled
outside the clock (ex: 00 above the 12, 05 above the 1).
Jane drew the hands correctly on the first six clock
problems, but then recorded the time incorrectly on the three problems where
she had to look at the hands to tell what the time was. Interestingly enough, she recorded all the
minutes correctly with just the hour hand off by 1. The strategy that she used for finding the
minutes is clear when looking at all the clocks on the page. She used jumping arches from number to number
on the clock to count by 5’s. Drawing
these lines is the strategy my mentor has been working with them on and proved
to be effective for Jane in all nine problems on the page. These examples show me that she has a
strength and understanding of the fact that there is 5 minutes represented
between two numbers on an analog clock.
However, just from looking at this sheet that remains an assumption
because of the example clock I mentioned above.
Though I can see the made the arches to assume she counted by 5’s on her
own, I do not know for certain (considering the sheet was done at home) that she
didn’t just look at the example to give her the adequate hand to draw. She may understand that we count by 5’s to
find what goes in the minutes, but not actually comprehend that it represents
five minutes of passing time within an hour.
However, one concept I observe that Jane shows full understanding of is
the difference in lengths between the minute and hour hands. She clearly shows one long and one short when
depicting the time in the given problems with no confusion.
Another interesting part of Jane’s responses that I mentioned
briefly above, is that she interpreted the hour hand on the last three clocks
consistently an hour before what is correct.
For example, the first clock depicts 11:15 and she responded 12:15, the
second clock depicts 4:45 and she responded 5:45. I have two initial thoughts on why Jane possibly
did this. First, the minutes in the
examples isn’t at the “top of the hour position” so since the hands are already
drawn in properly, the hour hand falls between two numbers rather than pointing
exactly to one (how a child would draw 9:45, with the hour hand exactly on the
9). When first teaching students time,
the hands point exactly to the numbers 1-12 and any conception of “in-between”
is absent initially. So, this is a
logical source of confusion for a young learner who is just getting used to
telling time. I believe that Jane was
confused which number to depict as the hour because it was not pointing to just
one. This then lead her to choose the
number it hadn’t reached yet making her responses 1 hour early. My second thought pertains to why she would choose the number the hand
hadn’t reached yet versus the number it had just passed. It is possible that Jane doesn’t understand
that as time passes on an analog clock, the hands move around to the right in a
clockwise motion. My students haven’t
been exposed to manipulating a clock themselves yet. Instead my mentor’s focus for them right now
is to just be able to read/draw given times on a clock. This leads me to believe that Jane has some
confusion about how a clock actually operates signaling that she may not be
comprehending “what time it is” at all.
To be able to advance Jane’s thinking I would first and
foremost need to ask her to explain why she completed the problems in the way
that she did. I would need to know what
her thought process was in writing the hands the way she did to really know
what misconceptions she has. Since this
assignment was completed for homework I am unsure. The next advancement I could make would be to
actually start using clock manipulatives to model and show consistently that in
a given hour the hour hand moves between two numbers and to the right. I would show her that (in 1 hour) while the
minute hand moves all the way around once, the hour hand only moves slightly
and that all the minutes within that one cycle pertain to the number it has
passed, even if the hand is closest to the next number on the clock.
This is a brilliant analysis. You've done great job at revealing how much can be inferred (or hypothesized) from just one simple artifact of student work. Another way you might think of advancing this student's understanding is to have her talk to others. For example, what might happen if she had to defend her thinking to her peers and if she was presented with alternative ways of filling out the time. I think that just an experience would be beneficial for her and for other students who also might have "logical" but slightly misconceived notions of telling time.
ReplyDelete