The sample of student work I examined
was actually two student’s work they did on my unit plan assessment. I choose
to look at these this assessment because I felt it’d be beneficial to analyze
the assessments in greater depth while I’m starting to plan my unit. The
student on the left is a student that I would classify as a high level
mathematic student based on the work I’ve seen them doing in class and the
answers/attempts they provided on their assessment. The student on the right is
probably between a low and middle level student. I would classify them there
because I’ve seen students below them and above them and they show good
attempts to answer the questions with writing the number values and spelling
the coin names. The student on the left named all the coins correctly and attempted
to spell them correctly. This student sounded the words out as best they could
and it was clear for me to read. They got all the number values correct when
answering what the values for each coin was. This student even used the money
notation for each question. For the last question this student was able to
write down the correct amounts for a nickel and a penny but just didn’t write
what that added up to. This shows me that early the student didn’t have enough
time to add them together or that sine it was in a word problem maybe they
struggled adding it together. Now looking at the student on the right, you can
see that the student was trying to write letters for the first question to
answer the names of the coins and for the second question they wrote numbers
down. Although the letters they wrote seem to have no connection to the coin
names, it shows me that they at least recognized that I was asking them for the
name not the value, which some other students were not able to do. So the
student can understand how they need to answer the question and what is being
asked but they struggle to write the letter that could correspond with the coin
name (like writing a q to acknowledge it’s a quarter). There is a gap in this
student’s understanding of what money values exist (5, 10, 25, 1, etc) and how
not just any number can have a coin value. They also struggle with writing
their numbers and did not solve the word problem.
If I wanted to advance the student
on the left’s thinking I would want to focus on their word problem solving
skills. The incorrect spelling of the coins is not as important because I can
tell what word they were spelling and how they sounded it out. I would focus on
the word problems because this student is very good at understanding the values
that need to be added but I’m not quite sure if they are confused how to solve
a word problem but they are able to use the correct values so that is a good
start for them. I think utilizing and having them create word problems and
“number stories” would be good for this student. As for the student on the
right, I would focus on the coin names and writing the name or the first letter
of the word so that the student gets a better understanding of the name of the
coin and being able to connect that with the value. Another way to advance the
students thinking is establishing the understanding that the coin values go 1,
5, 10, 25. The values are not random numbers, this could help students be able
to learn the values rather than guessing what number the coin equals. Looking
ahead on my unit plan it is going to be interesting working with a very wide
range of student level ability but scaffolding like I have mentioned will be
vital for the students benefit.
No comments:
Post a Comment