This week I led the Fast Math lesson warm up in which
students were asked to round various decimal numbers to the nearest whole
number. The students were given 2 minutes to complete the task then I led a
class discussion to find the correct answers. During the class discussion I
called on a student to read the unrounded decimal number and the rounded
answer. I then asked the student, whether their answer was right or wrong, to
explain why they rounded up or down. Being asked to explain their thinking was
something that many students struggled with, but after talking to my MT I found
out that the students are not used to having to explain their thinking.
In order to have students
be more successful in the future during class discussions that require deeper
explanation of why they did what they did, I will need to scaffold their
thinking and give them some sentence starters. With this particular class
discussion, there is little I can do to further their thinking because the
concept being discussed is pretty straightforward and there is really only one
way to come to the correct answer. One thing I can do to advance student
thinking is to add additional digits to the numbers I am asking the students to
round, which will create a situation where students will potentially have to
round twice.
Note: Since this lesson and discussion was taught, the class has had more practice with rounding and seems to have a better understanding of rounding.
It is good to hear that you are beginning to try out having whole-class discussions in your classroom, since, as you see, this is something that students are not always open to at first. Try to think about explicitly using the different talk moves (e.g., revoicing, repeating, etc.). This will help you help students support one another through the explaining of one another's mathematical thoughts.
ReplyDelete