The sample of
work I chose this week is a worksheet from the Everyday Math curriculum my
class uses about counting up and counting back on the number grid. With my first grade students we have been
working a lot on counting our hops up and back on the grid using their fingers
so the concept is definitely familiar.
This day, I conducted a whole group lesson specifically about counting on
the number grid and this sheet was given for independent work after the
lesson. As I was walking around I noticed
this student understood what each problem was asking him to do (count up or
back), referring to the number grid to count, and filling in his
responses. However, each response was 1
off either too high or too low. At first
I thought maybe he was making the common mistake of saying 1 before he even
made a hop making the final answer 1 too low
(Ex: start at 27, count up 10.
Student puts their finger on 27 and says 1, hops to 28 and says 2,
etc.). However, when I asked him to show
me how he arrived at his answers he did something really interesting. He did not do what I had anticipated. He correctly started his hops, but when he
arrived at the end of a row (10, 20, 30) he did two things: he either didn’t
count the first number after the sweep (11, 21, 31) and moved on to the next
number (12, 22, 32) leaving his answer 1 too big OR he counted the sweep AS a
hop resulting in his answer being 1 too small.
In the photo included of his work his answers were erased and corrected
after talking it through with me and modeling again how we make a sweep when
counting on the number grid. Once we
worked together on this he completed #6 on his own and correctly. This leads me to believe two things about his
thinking. First would be that in a whole
class setting he didn’t receive the individualized attention he needed to
understand fully how to maneuver the number grid. There is a large class number grid next to
the smart board where I model how to count on and each student uses the back
page of their math journal for an individual copy. I observed him complete this process in class
a couple times, but he may have just
been going through the motions as I did them instead of making a conceptual
understanding of how the “hop” helps us count up and back. I think one way to push his thinking further
or to make this concept come to life and make sense would be to incorporate
this number grid into more of an addition problem and having him use
manipulative on the grid itself. From getting
to know this student, I know that at home he works with his parents on simple
addition problems and having a student start at a point and move 10 spaces to
see where they end up on a grid is essentially an addition problem phrased
differently. I think this student would benefit
from seeing what he is adding on to with some type of counters.
Second, my observations and this sample of work leads me to believe that this
student may not understand that counting on the number grid is the same process
of adding on as counting on our fingers or with counters would be. He may be actively paying attention to the
hops he is making but not understanding that each hop is how we add 1 to a
number. If he understood that this is
just another way of counting to add on or take away maybe he would have been
able to self-correct that starting at 24, counting up 10, and ending at 33 doesn’t
quite make sense because that only adds 9.
I believe that using the number grid as a reference and instead counting
with fingers or counters may be more beneficial for this particular student to
understand. Also, I think that
practicing the way we sweep our finger down a number grid would help with this
student too.
Your analysis is thorough and excellent, and it sounds like you are doing a great job in your classes in probing and investigating student thinking and the methods they use.
ReplyDeleteThe suggestions I would have here is to think about, as you hint, how you can expand on the work / thinking done on this worksheet and to explicitly expand it / connect it to multiple representations of the same concept (e.g., the number grid). Additionally, given that presumably this child now understands the errors of his previous method, he might be a very valuable resource in explaining his old and new reasoning to his classmates (e.g., via whole-class discussion).